Image Credit: Jess Bailey Creative Commons (CC)

EDCI 336, Post #1

This week, we watched Jeff Hopkins’ TEDx talk and the documentary Most Likely to Succeed, which sparked a lot of discussion in our breakout rooms about what it actually means to be a teacher. As a teacher candidate, I’ve been thinking a lot about what the shift from a system designed for standardized delivery to one that actually prioritizes the student would look like. Jeff Hopkins, the founder of the Pacific School of Innovation and Inquiry (PSII), explained throughout his talk that the current education model is built on “artificial subject silos”, emphasizing that we are taught to value memorizing facts over true inquiry-based learning and understanding. This focus on high-level competencies like critical thinking is a clear connection to the B.C. Ministry’s 2023 Reporting Policy, which moves us away from letter grades and toward the Proficiency Scale to better reflect how students are actually progressing (K-12 Student Reporting Policy – Province of British Columbia).

Image Credit: Artboard Studio Creative Commons (CC)

The evidence from Jeff Hopkins’ talk alongside everything we discussed in class, shows me that our current assessment strategies are not just outdated, they are actually potentially harmful and destructive for students and their overall well-being. Hopkins talks about a “mismatch” between institutional demands and youth developmental needs, which leads to high levels of anxiety. As a teacher candidate, I believe that many educators rely on standardized testing and exact schedules because they feel safer and easier to follow. But true learning, on the other hand, is often an unstructured, chaotic and authentic process. Moving towards a more comprehensive model honestly requires both administrators and parents to value outcomes that are not as simple as a quantifiable percentage on a test.

Image Credit: Museums Victoria Creative Commons (CC)

I think I’ve gradually learned to understand the difference between a Lesson Plan and a Learning Plan, and that basically the only real difference is compliance and agency. A lesson plan is often teacher-led and directed, with the expectation that 30 students will hit the same target at the exact same time; whereas in contrast, a learning plan is an ongoing, emergent and reflexive plan that evolves in response to student input.

When I did my Link2Practice at Belmont Secondary, a mentor teacher introduced me to Single-Point Rubrics. By focusing on “Proficient” as the central column and leaving the sides open for “Evidence of Strength” and “Areas for Growth,” we remove that “ceiling” of traditional 4-column rubrics. This connects directly to the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD); because it allows students to push their individual boundaries through personalized feedback rather than chasing a predetermined set limit.

Image Credit: Taylor Flowe Creative Commons (CC)

While I like the “low-stakes, high-growth” potential of inquiry, I have two questions/ concerns. 

The first is about ELL equity and scaffolding. In my EDCI 447 course (Principles of Teaching English Language Learning), we talked a lot about how academic language can take 5–10 years to master. If an inquiry project has too many options and not enough scaffolding, an ELL student might be amazing at conversational interaction but lack the “academic” language depth that’s actually required for graduation. We have to make sure that “student-led” doesn’t mean “unsupported,” especially for those with limited L1 (First Language) literacy and/or less resources at home.

My other focus is on Digital Privacy and Literacy. Hopkins gave the example of a student whose research paper on Ebola reached thousands of people. While an “authentic audience” is the goal of modern education, it does highlight the need for Digital Literacy instruction. We have to make sure that students understand their digital footprint so that their inquiry-based projects don’t cause unintended setbacks or consequences later in life.

References:

Hopkins, J. (2014). Education as if people mattered. TEDxVictoria.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power, and Pedagogy. (Connections to Academic vs. Social Language).

BC Ministry of Education. (2023). K-12 Student Reporting Policy Framework.

---